Thread:Okaminarutofan999/@comment-5846769-20170708211146/@comment-5846769-20170710160722

Bureaucrats have more tools than administrators, the tag doesn't simply exist to hand out 'status' as you call it. I don't find what you've said to be rude, but you've misinterpreted my usage of the word 'status'. A status is a position, a noun used for classifying official rank or standings, i.e. rights, within a group, in this case the wiki. When I say status, I mean it in this sense.

As for the unnecessary fluff, I realise that I myself may have misinterpreted the bureaucrat's abilities and rights, largely in part due to the poor effort wikia as a website makes to explain the roles and what they do. My attempts to find clarification have only been met with conflicting answers between wikia's explanations (in which they don't have the same rights as admins) and the community's (in which they do).

This isn't to say that I don't know the unique rights a bureaucrat has, only that I'm unsure whether or not they also have the rights of administrators (which, according to wikia, could easily be solved by granting the bureaucrat administrator rights as well - but this is veering off-topic).

I retract my first statement due to a loss of confidence through the answers I found, but still hold the point that there are currently too few non-anonymous users for another bureaucrat to be needed in improving the wiki now that I'm able to monitor it once more, which you've said is understandable so there should be no need for argument there.

Either way, administrator rights have been granted. Sorry for the wall of text.